Showing posts with label Phyllis Mack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Phyllis Mack. Show all posts

Sunday, 18 August 2013

Methodism and "Heart Religion"

I'm finishing up Heart Religion in the British Enlightenment. This is an extraordinarily deep intellectual work by Rutgers Professor of History, Phyllis Mack. After seeing Bruce Hindmarsh's review of Heart Religion in the British Enlightenment in Books and Culture, I've wanted to read Mack's book, and I am glad that I did.

In many ways, Mack's Heart Religion is set up as a polemic against E.P. Thompson's classic, The Making of the English Working Class in which he portrays early Methodists as emotionally repressed. Mack seeks to overturn Thompson's thesis, presenting early Methodists as thoughtful, and, in many cases, active agents of their own spirituality.

Mack wants to show that early Methodists fit within the culture of the Enlightenment at that time while remaining true to the beliefs and practices that John Wesley taught. Mack critiques scholarship that rejects zealous Christians as capable of acting as agents of their own behavior. Because Methodists are seen by secular scholars as being unduly influenced by religion, they are supposedly incapable of making objective decisions. Countering this notion, Mack writes, "Clearly, if we want to understand the early Methodists on their own terms, we need a more complex definition of agency than the liberal model of individual autonomy used by most secular historians, for Methodists and others defined agency not as the freedom to do what one wants but as the freedom to want and to do what is right. Since 'what is right' was determined both by absolute truth or God and by individual conscience, agency implied obedience and ethical responsibility as well as the freedom to make choices and act on them. And since doing what is right inevitably means subduing at least some of one's own habits, desires, and impulses, agency implied self-negation as well as self-expression" (p. 9). To make her case, Mack has mined an enormous amount of unpublished and published writings (letters, diaries, autobiographies, pamphlets, etc.) from ordinary folks, and spends the bulk of her book presenting case after case of men and women who consciously tried to live as exemplary Christians in the midst of experiencing the realities of physical and emotional pain. Throughout her book, Mack contends that Methodists sought to understand and control their emotions, and were thus not enslaved to their passions.

A secondary theme in the book is Mack's focus on gender roles in Methodism, spending much of her energy in redeeming women from their perception as either emotionless or incapable of self-control. Mary Bosanquet Fletcher, Sarah Crosby, and Hester Ann Rogers feature prominently in Heart Religion, which presents a compelling case for the "agency" of Methodist women.

A word of caution: Mack's book is not light reading. I wouldn't suggest reading Heart Religion shortly before bed as it requires regular pauses to reflect on her thesis as it pertains to the enormous evidence that Mack has garnered. But the careful reflection and intellectual rigor that Heart Religion demands seems to be exactly the point of the book as Mack seeks to change the public's perception of early Methodists as blind enthusiasts.

Saturday, 3 August 2013

The Latest Reading List

Wow, the beginning of the semester is almost here! It's hard to believe that summer break is almost over. During the past week I have been preparing for my two fall courses: "Religion in American Life" and "Jonathan Edwards's Life, Thought, and Legacy in American Religious Culture." I'm hoping that by integrating online quizzes into these courses, that I will be rewarded with more time for research and writing during the semester.

With the remaining two weeks before the start of the fall semester, I hope to put the finishing touches on my lectures, do additional research for my project on Jonathan Edwards and transatlantic print culture, and read some of the books that recently arrived in the mail.

My most recent purchases include:

Richard Heitzenrater's Mirror and Memory: Reflections on Early Methodism
Phyllis Mack's Heart Religion in the British Enlightenment: Gender and Emotion in Early Methodism
Emma Macleod's British Visions of America, 1775-1820
Frank Lambert's James Habersham: Loyalty, Politics, and Commerce in Colonial Georgia
Tony Claydon's Europe and the Making of England, 1660-1760

Friday, 4 January 2013

Day 2 at AHA

 On day two of the AHA/ASCH conferences, I attended two sessions. The first was entitled "Funding Your Research," from 10:30am to 12:00pm. The session was chaired by Laura Isabel Serna of the University of Southern California, and included two other panelists, Deborah Harkness of the University of Southern California, and Raul Ramos of the University of Houston.

Deborah Harkness and Laura Isabel Serna offered the following advice to graduate students and junior faculty:
  • Start by applying for small grants
  • Once earning one-month grants at specific archives, then try for three-month grants before attempting to apply for long-term NEH-sponsored fellowships
  • Diversify your applications
Raul  Ramos followed up with some additional helpful hints:
  • Mine "acknowledgement" sections in books for potential grants
  • Make sure you read and follow the application requirements carefully
  • When possible, review successful applications, noting the style and content
  • Ask your colleagues to look over your application
  • Attend your university's grant-writing seminars
While much of this advice may fall under the category of common sense, this panel reminded me of how important it is do as many things right as possible when applying for competitive grants.

The second session I attended was entitled "The Private Lives and Social Worlds of Eighteenth-Century Religious Women," from 2:30pm to 4:30pm. Bruce Hindmarsh of Regent College chaired the session and panelists included Phyllis Mack of Rutgers, Joanna Cruickshank of Deakin University, and Cindy Aalders, a PhD student at Lincoln College, Oxford.

This was an excellent session that drew from the expertise of many Methodist scholars in the room, including Dick Heitzenrater. I felt humbled as I reflected on my own knowledge of Methodism when compared to these distinguished scholars. Interestingly, all three panelists seemed to confirm that diary writing, from the perspective of many eighteenth-century women, was not a private affair. Rather, diaries were intended to be passed along to others within certain circles, and sometimes meant to be published. While it is known that John Wesley and George Whitefield intended that their diaries should be published, it has been assumed by many historians that women penned their thoughts in solitary confinement, intending to use their personal narratives for individualistic spiritual growth.

Now it's time to reflect on these sessions over more great New Orleans food!