data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7995c/7995c428b492b7c5a77cd99dfb714360f193d5b3" alt=""
The new issue of Fides et Historia (Summer/Fall 2011) is currently out, and it includes some interesting articles and book reviews. The first section is a forum on "Reconciling the Historian's Craft and Religious Belief," and includes essays by Brad Gregory, Mark Noll, Anthea Butler, David Hollinger, and Bruce Kucklick (among others). I found Noll's article to be one of the most interesting. He examines the work of the English philosopher F.H. Bradley and whether scholars should value accounts of the supernatural when writing history.
The second section is an interesting roundtable discussion on the book, Confessing History. I think that Jay Green's essay expresses the sentiment of many Christian historians who look up to the work of historians such as Noll and Marsden.
Finally, there are a number of good reviews. Steven Pointer writes about Alister
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e6f3/3e6f3c5cab3fbabe8e716edc5334f5b15f6dcabb" alt=""
I am a proud member of the Conference on Faith and History, and the current issue reaffirms to me that other historians have a similar outlook on how to do religious history.
Jonathan Yeager
No comments:
Post a Comment